COUNCIL OF ELDERS
In
February 1998, Deena Metzger sent out the first of a series of letters outlining
her vision of a global council of elders--Elders of the various world traditions,
gathered together, discovering and teaching each other, as well as society,
the ways and the means of wisdom.
Letter 7 - September
2001
Letter 6 - December 1999
Letter 5 - April 1999
Letter 4 - November 1998
Letter 3 - May 1998 (Appeared
in Whole Life Times )
Letter 2 - March
1998
Letter 1 - February
1998
Transmission
Letter
April 4, 1999
Fifth Call Council of Elders
Sitting in Council in
Zimbabwe and Finding Hope
Dear Friends:
I am beginning
to write this letter on Easter Sunday in the midst of the Festival of Pesach
in which we are enjoined to remember the difficult passage through Mitzraim,
the 'narrow place,' toward freedom as if we are going through that passage ourselves.
Even as I write these words, NATO is bombing Belgrade. I am assuming that the
questions in my mind are similar to the question in your minds:
Will things change and how? How long can such wars
continue? What are our individual responsibilities? What is our [unconscious]
individual participation in the seeming inevitability of violence?
Will we ever truly govern ourselves according to
answers to such questions as these: What drives people crazy? What enrages them?
What drives them to violence?
Will we, living in North America, forever assume
our innocence in the face of fascism, police states, civil wars, terrorism,
ethnic cleansing, nuclear disasters elsewhere? Will we continue to consider
ourselves separate because we believe it can't happen here and also that we
are blameless in regard to any such occurrences elsewhere? Will we face the
economic, political and military hegemony that has entangled us, without admission
of our complicity, in such events elsewhere?
On another note: Will human beings be able to make
the individual changes that can lead to planetary changes in order to take us
through a wormhole toward peace rather than defeat? Where/who are the bearers
of wisdom and how can we consult them?
One intention
of this letter is to thank all of those who have written or called, so many
of whom are people of color and native people whose views and understanding
I treasure beyond words. I am deeply reassured because councils are occurring
everywhere - even councils of young people -- and these councils are creating
their own forms and rhythms. Also I'm grateful to the many who have written
to confirm that you've heard the call and, wrestling with this angel, are accepting
the honor and the responsibility of being an elder.
I also feel compelled to respond to several correspondents
who have cautioned me against, and reprimanded me for, speaking of how dire
our situation is. But no earnest declaration that things are exactly as they
ought to be has, so far, reassured me. Many, but not all of such letters, have
come from people speaking only from their own circumstances: those who aren't
nor ever have been fleeing without food, papers or possessions like the citizens
of Kosovo nor living through bombings like the citizens of Belgrade, nor holocausted
like elephants and other species. Still, I have considered long and hard the
content of these letters because I want to be in Council with others especially
those who think differently from myself. I have considered whether it is my
language, or the activities, that 'are especially poisonous.' And so I have
weighed the consequences of lightening what I see. I have also questioned taking
on the heavy burden of cultural responsibility for so much which is devastating
all the species on the planet. [Devastation is a word I was 'instructed,'
not to use by someone who experienced ongoing 'heaviness' after I used it "in
reference to a woman's experience concerning breast cancer Ö as using it or
thinking it may/will/can cause you and others to experience illness." The writer,
citing support from a Balinese healer advised me to use "depression or frustration"
in its stead. If only it was just frustration and depression we had to deal
with. "Don't ever think it again!" the man warned.]
Ultimately, I find myself unwilling to look away
from the mirror, which we must hold up to ourselves if anything is to be saved.
Looking away or mitigating what is there does not erase what is to be faced.
After we see clearly what we are up against in the world and in ourselves, we
can, with each other's counsel and support begin the slow, careful, thoughtful
work of recreating our lives.
In regard to some other responses, I do not find
it in myself to condone current behavior because it has a historic base. Because
we are not the only ones in history to have engaged in violence against people,
animals and the earth, does not relieve us from the consequences of our behavior
today. Consciousness teaches us that it is possible to change ourselves and
we are not doomed to repeat history because it is natural or has precedence.
When we are willing to see that we are subtly and overtly entangled in, or allied
with, economic, religious and military organizations that are in their own ways
totalitarian and from whose influence no one, no being on the planet is safe,
we have a chance. The old axiom applies here: We may not be able to change anyone
else, but we can explore how to change ourselves as we are the ones who must
change.
In my mind, it makes a difference to move from
the obsession with one's own survival and well being, and one's infatuation
with one's own goodness, to imagining ways that all beings might survive and
live substantial and meaningful lives. In order to achieve this, we will have
to be cagey to negotiate the social, political, economic minefields that threaten
our existence everywhere recognizing that each mine removed to protect ourselves
provides an area of safety for others, while also recognizing that removing
the mines is not sufficient-- we have to undo the system that thinks in terms
of mines to begin with.
Again, responding to some letters, though I have
been assured that the system is fine, I find no evidence for it. The cosmic
order, the natural world, Hozro, call it what you will, these systems
are, indeed, fine. The task is to accord our humanly contrived systems with
these. I do not think we have yet recognized how willful we are as human beings
and how willfully we obscure divine principles and impose our own ways on the
natural world. No matter how clever we think ourselves, we have not managed
to integrate all the factors and elements that were, before our intervention,
in dynamic balance. Perhaps nothing more -and nothing less -than considering
all others as passionately as ourselves is the key to survival.
And to those who have written with broken hearts
saying they have come to the point where they are virtually paralyzed by looking
in the mirror realizing that they cannot make a move without doing great harm
if only that they are dependent even when living a simple committed life on
an inordinate number of resources that undermine and deplete the environment
and the lives of people all over the world -- to these people I say what I continually
say to myself: No matter how painful it is, let's continue to scrutinize ourselves
and our culture. The pain we feel is nothing compared to the pain we inflict
on ourselves and others, and we will, in concert with each other, come to new
ways of being that will make a difference. Accordingly, to those who like myself
sometimes feel they are collapsing under the weight of it all, I offer a little
humor and solace from Naomi Newman's one woman show, Snake Talk: " Fall
down, get up, is one motion."
These letters
have been circulating to people and places beyond my network - bless Spider
Woman. Those of us who are working in the world in our different ways are seeing
the potential for change. It is becoming increasingly clear that we are in
the hands of what is far greater than us and so we must ask whether and how
we can each change ourselves and our ways of life radically enough to come forth
to meet what is being offered which can we must presume, ultimately, save us
- and everything.
Perhaps, again, it is just this which is being
asked of us: that we do not turn away, that we gather strength and vision from
each other, that we look deeply at what we have wrought, grieve it and step
away, that we recognize that we can live differently, and that there is much
joy and fulfillment in this process of moving out of what is destructive toward
what is life giving.
Now I would like to tell you two stories regarding sitting in Council in Zimbabwe. Afterwards, you will understand why, for the first time in a long time, despite our dire circumstances, I feel hope.
In December 1998, I traveled to Zimbabwe to live within the community, the daré , and to do mutual initiatory work with a renowned traditional Shona healer, a nganga, Augustine Kandemwa who is married to an Ndebele woman, herself a dream teller and trance medium. The Shona and Ndebele peoples have been enemies for years and it is significant that these two people have created an urban intertribal healing sanctuary. Augustine sees that he has been given the charge of peacemaking and his marriage with Simakuhle is one of the ways that peacemaking is being enacted through them.
My husband,
Michael Ortiz Hill, following a dream, his great interest in Bantu culture,
and a book he was researching, first went to Africa in 1996 where he met and
began working alongside Augustine. I went with Michael in 1997 and again in
1998.
Just before leaving for Africa I had sent out the
last Elder's Council letter which contained a dream communication from the Koji
people. In that letter, I wrote:
Sitting in
Council with the daré was quite different than I had imagined.
We did not only sit in formal sessions seeking counsel from each other; we were
in council all the time. Upon meeting, we quickly agreed, almost without formally
consulting each other, that we would be holding certain questions in our minds
at all times - essentially the questions that have been the basis of these letters:
What are the life sustaining ways? How can we change our lives so that we live
according to them? What forms and actions will protect us from what is pernicious
in modern culture? What of the old or traditional shall we preserve and re-instate
and what of the new is useful to all of us and where shall we look for yet newer
directions?
Upon first meeting, Augustine and Michael entered
into a mutual relationship of complete respect so it was a given that we would
listen most carefully to each other in order to receive each other's wisdom
and also that we had thrown in our lot with each other and that survival had
to be mutual. It was as if every conversation and dream and event addressed
these questions so that we are always alert to the moment and to the larger
issues.
One evening, Augustine's oldest son was trance-possessed
for the first time. This was an extraordinary event and we were all joyous for
it meant, among other things, that Augustine would have a dharma heir in his
own family. But what was most moving to Augustine was that the wise grandfather,
ancestor spirit, the old sekiru, who appeared through his son, George,
spoke of healing the deep rift between Augustine and the rest of his original
family that had occurred when spirit impelled him to step away from Christianity
to take on the role of a native healer. From the moment the sekiru appeared,
we all, as if carried by him, began the initiatory, psychological and ritual
work that would prepare George and his family for this work as well as healing
our own relationships in our own families. Part of the wisdom, which came to
us in this instance from the Shona tradition, is the necessity to heal history
and the ancestors as well as ourselves and each other. This idea is implicit
in the Kaddish, in the Mass, in the prayers many traditions say for the dead,
but perhaps without focusing so particularly on the particular and individual
historic circumstances that need to be redressed and redeemed. We were each
compelled by inner circumstances to bring the scrutiny of self also to our history
and to work from there, psychologically, practically and ritually. It was not
long before it became evident that what might be called personal or domestic
concerns had global implications. Considering tribal conflict in Rwanda, for
example, and how such tensions are manipulated for political purposes as well
as the rise of nationalism in Europe and elsewhere, we began to understand something
of why we were being led in this direction.
This was not what any of us had expected but Augustine
because of his native tradition is deeply sensitive to the directions of spirit
and the assistance of the ancestors and so led us on to this unexpected path.
What was most evident to all of us, was that when we were in council in Zimbabwe,
the spirits and ancestors were sitting with us.
My sense of these Councils of Elders is that each
of them will yield important insight to the participants which will often be
relevant to all of us as we walk this maverick path of doing the individual
work of healing outside of institutional or legislative domination and without
concern for economic gain.
Synchronistically, Michael had begun such work
with his family earlier last fall and I, myself, in my own way was working on
myself in regard to my relationship with my sons. Several of the other Americans
and Europeans who were traveling with us were led, similarly to consider these
issues as primary as we recognized that spirit was sitting in council with us,
giving us a direction. Needless to say, I think we would be endangered by any
formula which insists on how this is to be accomplished but it seems to me that
we might consider the same philosophy that is essential to council - to bring
to each other mutual respect and a deep desire to know and be informed by the
wisdom and being of the other and to honor the ways of reconciliation that each
culture has developed.
A few days ago we received the following from Augustine:
I am in the
process of writing the next story in detail and hope to publish it soon. But
as it is of such an extraordinary nature, I wish to communicate its essence
to you because it alters the territory in which most of us have been working.
On January 6th, Epiphany, we were on
the way to Chobe, an animal preserve in Botswana known for its elephant herds.
Michael asked me "How does one sit in council with elephants?"
"I don't know," I answered. "I do not know. I do
not even know how to imagine it."
Now I know something of it. And what I know is
that the animals come forth.
There were
five of us and Michael and I were in the open flat bed of the truck. I had the
hope and intention of sitting in council with the elephants for the sake of
mutual survival. I had determinedly prepared for this for two years, though
without knowing how to prepare. After several hours of prayer and invocation,
I saw an elephant deliberately walking toward us from three-quarters of a mile
away. When he came to the truck, he faced us directly, acknowledged us, then
walked toward us until we were four feet from each other. He then looked me
directly in the eye for a very very long time, twenty minutes perhaps. Afterwards,
when we were leaving the park, dozens of elephants came down from the hills
and carefully aligned themselves for a half mile along the riverbed unmistakably
addressing us as we exited the park.
What was transmitted? I don't know yet. But surely
something about the fundamental values and ways of being that are at the foundation
of the community of this remarkable species.
What occurred? I think, or hope, an alliance was
created and some mysterious form for communication across vast distances and
species lines.
To what end? We will see.
What does it mean? We will all have to wrestle
with this but, for myself, and those who were with me, we will never be the
same. Our former understanding of the nature of the universe is irreversibly
shattered. Accordingly, I think it means that we are not the only intelligent,
conscious species in the universe and so we are not so alone with ourselves.
Perhaps it means that we may have assistance even from those we have so deeply
injured and so there is hope.
So many letters
have spoken to the difficulty of meeting the other in order to sit together
in council. Perhaps this is where we begin. In the act of trying to meet each
other, of living among each other for whatever period of time, sharing each
other's jeopardy and wisdom, many of our problems will be solved. Perhaps finding
each other, in whatever ways and forms we discover, is the essential
task and the solutions will proceed from our meetings. Small gestures toward
the other, unexpected alliances, unanticipated relationships, unprecedented
camaraderie, the willingness to find kin where we least expect it, allowing
ourselves to be altered in the crucible of relationship, abandoning our most
cherished beliefs in the face of the revelation of spirit and the other's wisdom,
being willing to break all the forms that keep us separate, not being daunted
in our insistence upon peace or beauty, these ways, I believe, open the doors
and heart.
Since this experience with the elephant, I have
been thinking ever more deeply about what it means to walk with integrity concerning
the interconnection between all beings as the basis of all conscious thought
and action. To live actively and resolutely on intimate terms and in continuous
relationship with all beings while in conversation also with the past and the
future, our ancestors and our descendants, is it not to enter into the sweet
marriage that rightly promises us possibility?
I send you my blessings and my deepest prayers for a rejuvenated planet, the restoration of the earth, and the return of the sacred everywhere.
Deena Metzger
P O Box 186
Topanga CA 90290
310-455-1089
deenametzger@deenametzger.com
Please feel free to distribute this letter and those that preceded it to whomever you wish. There is a short form of the first three letters which may be useful to you as it outlines the motivation for these letters and the concept of being an elder and the ways of council. Please ask for the article that appeared in the Whole Life Times.